I watched most of the debate earlier tonight. I felt bad for some of the members of the audience. It seemed they could not hide how bored they were. I noticed at least two men falling asleep! LOL!
I have not watched the full debate yet however what I have seen did not seem boring to me; do you think it might be boring and redundant because we really don’t understand what they are talking about, or because we’ve heard it all before and never see any results? Or was it really just plain boring?
I thought that this debate was more interesting than the first. I feel that more intentions of action were expressed even if we have heard the same over and over. What politics isn't redundant? With redundancy individuals can distingish one from another. It shows their commitment to being constant with ideas and function.
I have not watched the complete debate as of today. However, I have watched most of it and all I'm noticing is endless finger pointing, who did what worse. Well in the end, will it be the better of two evils whom is elected? That is my discontent. Secondly, there are some who feel this debate was "not boring", others who thought it was "redundant". Granted, I felt the jargon was a bit difficult to follow as well as the citing of different political events such as house voting and other events that both senate members were a part of that did not make the news. I want to say I'm pretty polished on "five dollar" words and up, but as I've seen stated, if 95% of the middle class is what runs our economy, I'm not sure 95% of the middle class viewers are well rehearsed in political jargon,especially when it seams repetetive and unprogressive.
I thought it was very redundant... sadly.
ReplyDeleteyeah sos....
ReplyDeleteI have not watched the full debate yet however what I have seen did not seem boring to me; do you think it might be boring and redundant because we really don’t understand what they are talking about, or because we’ve heard it all before and never see any results? Or was it really just plain boring?
ReplyDeleteI thought that this debate was more interesting than the first. I feel that more intentions of action were expressed even if we have heard the same over and over. What politics isn't redundant? With redundancy individuals can distingish one from another. It shows their commitment to being constant with ideas and function.
ReplyDeleteI have not watched the complete debate as of today. However, I have watched most of it and all I'm noticing is endless finger pointing, who did what worse. Well in the end, will it be the better of two evils whom is elected? That is my discontent. Secondly, there are some who feel this debate was "not boring", others who thought it was "redundant". Granted, I felt the jargon was a bit difficult to follow as well as the citing of different political events such as house voting and other events that both senate members were a part of that did not make the news. I want to say I'm pretty polished on "five dollar" words and up, but as I've seen stated, if 95% of the middle class is what runs our economy, I'm not sure 95% of the middle class viewers are well rehearsed in political jargon,especially when it seams repetetive and unprogressive.
ReplyDelete